
Designing Agents That Close Loops, Not Just Tasks
In the world of AI, there’s a critical distinction between agents that simply complete tasks and those that close entire loops. The latter is where true value lies.
The Difference Between Tasks and Loops
Tasks: These are individual actions that need to be performed. An agent might send an email, generate a report, or book a meeting.
Loops: These involve the entire process from initiation to completion. A loop might start with identifying a need, executing the necessary tasks, and ensuring the desired outcome is achieved.
Why Closing Loops Matters
When an agent can close a loop, it means less oversight, fewer dropped balls, and more consistent outcomes. In short, it’s the difference between simply doing and truly delivering.
Designing Agents That Close Loops
-
Clear Goals: Define what a completed loop looks like. The agent needs to know not just the task, but the intended outcome.
-
Feedback Loops: Build in mechanisms for the agent to check if the desired outcome has been achieved. This might involve gathering data or seeking confirmation from stakeholders.
-
Autonomy and Decision-Making: Empower agents with the ability to make decisions within certain parameters. This allows them to adapt and ensure the loop is closed effectively.
By designing agents that close loops, you’re not just streamlining tasks — you’re ensuring the entire process is taken care of, leading to more reliable and impactful outcomes.
Related
I'm a product builder and AI strategist focused on the future of work. I help executives and founders design AI-native tools that actually get used — especially in agent-based systems, increase executive productivity, and secure distributed workflows.
Want help turning ideas like these into reality? Let's talk.